Elon Musk’s X could be banned in UK after Grok undressed women

Elon Musk’s X could be banned in UK after Grok undressed women Josh Milton Published January 9, 2026 5:42pm Updated January 9, 2026 8:48pm Share this article via whatsappShare this article via xCopy the link to this article.Link is copiedShare this article via facebook Comment now Comments Metro has seen hundreds of examples of Grok generating indecent images of women (Picture: Metro)

Elon Musk’s X could be blocked in the UK after Grok undressed thousands of women online, the government has said.

Ofcom is now deciding what to do with the social media giant’s artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot.

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said today she would back the media regulator if it decided to ban X over non-compliance with UK laws.

Kendall said: ‘Sexually manipulating images of women and children is despicable and abhorrent.’

She added: ‘I, and more importantly the public, would expect to see Ofcom update on next steps in days, not weeks.’

Ofcom told Metro earlier that after giving X a deadline for today, the platform finally ‘explained themselves’.

‘We’re now undertaking an expedited assessment as a matter of urgency and will provide further updates shortly,’ a spokesperson added.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) also confirmed to Metro earlier this week that the data protection watchdog was in talks with X.

Women ‘placed in bikinis’ hundreds of times per day by Grok

Grok is built into X and is free for all users (Picture: Getty Images AsiaPac)

X users are able to ask Grok – by tagging @grok in a tweet – to edit or create images on the platform.

Since late December, however, Grok has at times made dozens of degrading images of women every minute.

Metro saw an example today of a user asking Grok to forge a photograph of a woman ‘holding a baby and pulling down her clothes to breastfeed’.

In another, an anonymous X user asked the virtual assistant to unclothe a group of women by telling it that ‘they are men’.

Some users are now receiving automated responses saying that ‘image generation and editing are currently limited to paying subscribers’.

Free users can still edit images on X through its ‘edit image’ function, or on Grok’s app and website.

Ofcom can’t ‘go far enough’ to rein in Grok, says expert

Under the Online Safety Act (OSA), a bill that regulates online material, it is illegal to create or share intimate or sexually explicit images.

The Centre for Policy Studies questioned whether Ofcom can go far enough to protect users.

The think-tank’s communication and digital manager, MeIisa Tourt, told Metro ‘The OSA’s remit is strictly limited to user-to-user and search services, meaning it does not regulate AI models themselves until their output is shared.

Grok is built into X (Picture: Mateusz Slodkowski/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

‘To complicate matters, the OSA mandates that platforms treat “bots” as normal users, meaning that while a human might prompt a deepfake, the legal act of “sharing” is often performed by the platform’s own @Grok account.

‘This creates a regulatory blind spot that Ofcom may struggle to navigate with current enforcement tools.’

Tourt added that the law is murky around ‘deepfakes’ as it excludes images that show something ‘originally seen in public’, such as a bikini.

‘We risk ending up in a bizarre situation where posting a real non-consensual image of someone in a bikini is legal, but generating a fake one could theoretically carry a two-year prison sentence,’ she said.

'It made me feel exposed and powerless'

Among those who say users have asked Grok to create phoney images of them is Ruben Chorlton-Owen, a content creator from Wales.

He told Metro: ‘Some of my photos from Instagram have been used by AI to create bizarre and sexualised images of me in outfits I never agreed to, including “transparent outfits” and other dodgy combinations.’

Ruben Chorlton-Owen said his Instagram images have been edited (Picture: Ruben Chorlton-Owen)

In one exchange seen by Metro, a troll asked Grok to strip Ruben, with the bot making a synthetic image of the musician shirtless.

Under xAI’s acceptable use and privacy policies, users are prohibited from creating or sharing content that harms people.

But Ruben, 24, questioned whether X’s policies were robust enough.

‘It made me feel exposed and powerless, and highlighted how little control people have over their own images once online and myself as a content creator, whose photos are already accessible,’ he added.

Sexualised deepfakes ‘amount to a serious breach of privacy’

Grok is a type of generative AI that ingests information from datasets to learn patterns of how humans write, make images and film videos.

Clare Veal, a commercial solicitor at the Surrey-based firm Aubergine Legal, told Metro that AI tools like Grok don’t have a ‘moral judgement’.

‘That’s why platforms have a legal and ethical responsibility to build in guardrails,’ she said. 

‘When an AI chatbot is asked to “undress” a woman or a man and it complies, the harm is not hypothetical. 

Grok hoovers up huge amounts of data to ‘learn’ how to create content (Picture: Getty Images)

‘It is producing a sexualised deepfake of a real person without their consent and in UK law that can amount to a serious breach of privacy, data protection rights and potentially criminal law.

‘There are also data protection implications. Using a person’s likeness to generate sexualised content without consent can constitute unlawful processing of biometric data. 

More Trending

1. 

   ChatGPT wants your medical records - these are the risks

   Channel: Tech Tech 3 hours ago By Josh Milton
2. Has Maya Jama finally cracked the fight against Grok’s fake photos?
3. 'See-through bikini loophole meant Grok AI generated images of my genitalia'
4. 'I've watched child abuse online - I fear age ID checks is leading others to do the same'

‘From a civil law perspective, individuals may have claims for misuse of private information or harassment.’

Elon Musk: Users will face ‘consequences’ for making illicit pictures

Elon Musk has said anyone who asks the AI to generate illegal content would ‘suffer the same consequences’ as if they uploaded it themselves.

Anyone using Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 3, 2026

A statement on the X Safety account said: ‘We take action against illegal content on X, including Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), by removing it, permanently suspending accounts, and working with local governments and law enforcement as necessary.

‘Anyone using or prompting Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content.’

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at [email protected].

For more stories like this, check our news page.

Arrow MORE: The manosphere ‘wizards’ behind the deepfake epidemic sweeping social media

Arrow MORE: Rihanna casts Elon Musk’s trans daughter Vivian, 21, in lingerie campaign

Arrow MORE: Chinese impersonator is making a killing off his impression of Trump

Comment now Comments Add Metro as a Preferred Source on Google Add as preferred source News Updates

Stay on top of the headlines with daily email updates.

Email I agree to receive newsletters from Metro I agree to receive newsletters from Metro Sign UpSign Up

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Your information will be used in line with our Privacy Policy